My son wrote:
Hey Pops -
I’m totally loving this Corvette commercial… and I don’t like Chevy (sorry, Chevrolet) cars, nor have I ever been too fond of the Corvette. (If I’m going to buy an expensive sportscar, Chevy isn’t the first car company that comes to mind).
http://www.nitrobahn.com/news/2011-chevrolet-corvette-features-in-a-short-commercial/
To which I responded:
Well, it’s done by Goodby, Silverstein (think Got Milk?), so it’s well-crafted and hits on a good core idea. Unfortunately for them, their attempt at a Hal Riney voiceover doesn’t have the resonance of the real thing (the Reagan re-election campaign), so it’s not going to wear as well.
Also, they are counting on the fact that no one remembers that the original Corvette wasn’t conceived as “a rocket,” but rather a personal sports car (the Thunderbird was Ford’s entry). So the voiceover confounds the origins of the space program with the visuals of building today’s Corvette engine…eventually, I think, resulting in a sort of hollow, ho-hum feeling. But at low levels of repetition it will probably do well and they really aren’t interested in selling more Corvettes. It’s part of a larger GM – Chevrolet image campaign in preparation for their public stock offering tentatively planned for this fall.
But it’s fine for you to like it. Since you and I own GM, we should be pleased.
Pops
And then he went:
Now… obviously I understand that the Corvette was not a “rocket” in any way, shape or form as originally conceived (nor is it now), but those cars brought people closer to feeling the power of an engine – thus “rocket” – than ever before (if you didn’t have the money or means to ever own or see a classic European sports car), no?
At least it seems to me they’re successfully rewriting history
Bubba
p.s. We own GM what?!?
So I said:
When GM accepted the bail-out and went through bankruptcy, the US govt (hence, you and I) got controlling ownership of the company. Now the 55-year-old Charlie Wilson quote (“What’s good for General Motors is good for the country,” he said) is really true.
If you go back and examine the word “rocket” with respect to GM, you’ll find that as part of the post-World War II design of the GM family of brands (Harley Earl’s brainchild), it was Oldsmobile that was promoted as “the Rocket,” with models like the Rocket 88 and the Rocket 98. The Oldsmobile overhead-cam V8 engine was nicknamed the “Rocket.”
The original Corvette first shown in 1953 was powered by a “souped-up” six-cylinder engine, but it wasn’t the engine that got the hype, it was the fact that it was the first US production automobile with a fiberglass body. So…no, the Corvette didn’t start out to be “a rocket.”
Pops
(See my earlier auto rants)
A neckstrap by another name
June 27, 2010
I wanted to let my brother (also a recent purchaser of a Nikon) know about a piece of equipment I had acquired. From the email:
As you can guess, your brother chafed under the Nikon yoke. Or, said otherwise, never having been a “natural” fan of Nikons (just as I am not a “natural” fan of Porsches), I really didn’t like wearing the stock black neckstrap with the bright yellow “NIKON” on each shoulder. Besides, it’s kind of a clunky neckstrap.
Enter the Industry Disgrace!
Yes, the Industry Disgrace. By Crumpler. $30 worth of escape from Nikon-logo neckstraps.
A nice neckstrap. The straps lie flat on the chest. The camera pitches forward very little, even with the 55-200 mm zoom on it. The behind-the-neck “feel” is comfy. Lots of length adjustment.
And I can walk around with out feeling “cringe-y” because my neckstrap has exhibitionist tendencies (except, of course, for those of us who recognize the obscure Crumpler logo for what it is – everyone else is wondering what Punchy, the Hawaiian Punch mascot, is doing on your shoulder).![]()
So…swap your snooty Nikon neckstrap for a snootier Industry Disgrace. I did. I’m now the hottest snot in town. Just ask me.
To which my brother replied:
Agree on all points. Will investigate strap.
I go one step farther. Black electrical tape cut to fit over “NIKON” on flash housing. Ditto over “D90″ emblem. It helps when shooting groups of people in candid settings because they don’t read “NIKON” and react. Cartier-Bresson used to paint his Leicas black. to keep from distracting people.
Katrina post
June 25, 2010
I booted up an old Fujitsu tablet computer today that hadn’t been used for over three years and on the desktop was the text of an email that I sent to family and friends in September of 2005 following my first trip back to New Orleans after we evacuated for Katrina. The photos referred to in the text are posted to my Flickr account in a set called First post-Katrina visit.
Auto rants (3)
June 10, 2010
It’s been a year, and now I am (and the rest of you out there are, too) a part-owner of General Motors. Wish there were better news for the future, but it looks like they still don’t get it. Today’s New York Times reports that for “consistency” we will now have to refrain from calling anything Chevrolet a “Chevy.” The marketing people are behind this mandate which they see as a brand-strengthening move.
Last year I made it pretty clear (in Kick as Kick Can and Auto Rants (2)) that the problem with Chevrolet as a brand isn’t that people use a diminutive and endearing term once promoted by GM (Dinah Shore sang it long before they were driven to the levee). The problem is that Chevrolet doesn’t refer to anything identifiable but rather to an incredible range of vehicles that start with a Chevrolet-branded Daewoo manufactured in Korea and proceed upward in size and power through the Corvette and a series of heavy-duty trucks.
Bob Lutz is gone from the hallways of General Motors, but this latest brain-dead solution to GM’s branding problems is a case of thinking ‘way down deep within the same old box. As Ford is in the process of recognizing with the proposed elimination of the Mercury brand, re-badging vehicles with multiple brands is counter-productive in today’s market. Ford would compete in the US market with *gasp* only two brands.
First Tuesday in May
May 4, 2010
Two geese calling incessantly approaching from the shadows across the Mill Gut, falling silent and flying ten feet overhead and ten feet to the east, then resuming their calling as they skimmed the surface of the bay lit by the glow from the sky. A beautiful set of changing sunrise colors, a bright half moon straight up in the sky.
All kinds of songbirds, the ground under the cherry trees – which would have been in full bloom this past weekend if it hadn’t been for Thursday and Friday’s wind and rain that blew down the petals – strewn with a thick layer of pink petals. The grove of lilacs blooming behind the cherry trees is giving off a cinnamon-like smell that persists for perhaps a hundred yards.
Turning past the head of Bristol harbor, it was quiet enough to hear the whooshing sound of the beat of a heron’s wings coming up behind me, then flying on south towards Bristol Marine Services. Temperature in the upper 50′s, very hard to beat.
The final stages of lilac blooming on the stem I’ve been tracking are below: April 18th, April 25th, and May 2nd.
…and it continues
April 14, 2010
Obliged to re-shoot
April 6, 2010
eBooks and iPads and Blackberries, oh my!
February 18, 2010
At my present university the periodical magazine features a point-counterpoint discussion in each issue. This time the topic was whether the coming-of-age of eBooks would result in increased reading; to kill the suspense, I took the con side while a professor of performing arts took the pro side.
We made our arguments (in writing) last November as Barnes and Nobles’ Nook was in delayed shipping and well before Steve Jobs bewitched us all with the iPad. So I bring you a copy of the debate as it was printed on the same day that Amazon announces that its “Kindle for Blackberry” app is ready – and I’ve already started reading one of my Kindle books on my Blackberry, thank you. I can now read my Kindle books on two desktops, one netbook, my Blackberry and my Kindle. Fantastic.
Click on image for easy-to-read size.
Snow, Mardi Gras, and sap
February 16, 2010
I was out walking about three hours before my New Orleans running buddies reported for the Rex Run – beautiful woods in the dark with the snow making things visible. Sounded like a couple of tons of geese on the Mill Gut, squawking in the night. Snow falling in various quantities, from fitful flakes to great wet clusters; when I turned into the wind my glasses completely clogged up.
Thinking of the gang having King Cake and champagne, then the parades. A quick weather check from here suggests that it would be a great day for a record attempt at the Rex Run given the chilly temps (at 34 degrees only four degrees above the Bristol temperature) – hope it warms up enough later.
They tapped the trees at Coggeshall Farm about 10 days later this year than last year, but the sap froze overnight. The farm is doing its annual sugaring demonstration. Picture was taken on Valentine’s Day.
Happy Mardi Gras!








Bigfoot goes to the movies – Inception
July 23, 2010
Inception, written, produced, and directed by Christopher Nolan and starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Ken Watanabe, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page, and Cillian Murphy.
Go see it. It’s fine escapist story-telling. Oh, and if you don’t quite understand some bit of the plot or the logic while you’re watching the movie, don’t worry, there will be another bit that you don’t understand coming up in just a few seconds.
It is said that this movie would have been made solely because of director Nolan’s work on Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. What this movie lacks is the powerful story arc (did I ever think I would be saying that about a comic book story?) that the Batman series possesses. So what you have is the directorial skills of a young master being worked out on an inferior, far less tragic hero.
Leonardo DiCaprio isn’t aging well. If he continues in this direction he will be able to play those Edgar G. Robinson gangster tough-guy roles and to look the part. So he’s a little hard to focus on as the hero, he looks too worn, insufficiently resilient. Hardly by accident, to make Leonardo look young Nolan has once again used Michael Caine as the father-figure, this time as DiCaprio’s movie father-in-law rather than the surrogate father he played as Alfred.
DiCaprio plays Dom Cobb, an architect. His father-in-law is an architect who teaches architecture in Paris but who also, at another point in the movie, welcomes his son-in-law home to the United States. Never mind. Dom visits father-in-law in hopes of finding – what else – an architect. Father says he has a student even better than Dom was. This giant of a talent comes packaged in the petite 23-year old body of Ellen Page who, despite her gargantuan abilities (Ooo, look, she just folded the Septieme Arrondissement on top of itself) has the ego and presence of a fruit fly. I’ve lived around a few architects and I find that concept totally unbelievable.
Incidentally, the only extramarital smooch that takes place in the movie involves Page as Ariadne. Watch for it…it’s the high point of the sexual content of the film. Afterwards, the actors involved display self-conscious ”I can’t believe we just did that” looks that look too genuine to be coached.
This French connection apparently once played a bigger role in the screenplay, as the house that Dom’s wife (Marion Cotillard, yes, really a Parisienne by birth) is – on the outside – a structure that is pure grimy French. Her childhood dollhouse, presumably inside that house, however, seems curiously American Victorian in influence. It hides a fairly industrial-looking safe, so I doubt she really played with it much as a young girl. Anyhow, the French portion of the story is virtually excised. None of these people-based-in-Paris has even a smidgen of a French accent, not even Michael Caine.
There’s lots of things blowing up and startlingly appearing (not the least of which is Ken Watanabe doing a turn as an aged turtle), and a bunch of other people running around trying either to get information or to plant it. All you need to know is that we can inhabit other peoples’ dreams and extract information from them, and if we have to we can inhabit peoples’ dreams of dreams, and at least one person has been able to inject a belief into a person via a dream in a dream in a dream.
Wikipedia explains it all, and it might be a good idea to pop over there now and read the synopsis. That way you’ll be able to help your companion through the labyrinth.
Filed in Commentary, Movie Reviews